Tratamiento endoscópico para el reflujo gastroesofágico / Endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux

Resumen Durante las últimas 2 décadas se han desarrollado una serie de nuevos tratamientos endoscópicos para el tratamiento de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) como alternativas al tratamiento médico o funduplicatura quirúrgica. Estos dispositivos incluyen aplicación de tratamiento por radiofrecuencia (Stretta), plicatura endoscópica (EndoCinch, Plicator, Esophyx, MUSE) e inyección o implantación de biomateriales (Enteryx, Gatekeeper, Plexiglas, Duragel). Su objetivo es el alivio de los síntomas creando una barrera anatómica antirreflujo. En esta revisión del tema consideramos artículos indexados en Pubmed, Medline y Scielo en los últimos 10 años revisando un total de 55 trabajos. Evaluamos críticamente los resultados reportados, faltan datos a largo plazo superiores a 10 años. Estos procedimientos reducen el uso de inhibidores de la bomba de protones en cerca del 50%. Evaluaciones subjetivas reportan mejoría de la calidad de vida y satisfacción del paciente. Sin embargo, la evaluación objetiva con endoscopia, manometría, radiología y pHmetría son escasos y si los hay, no muestran cambios significativos. No existe evidencia convincente para adoptar estos métodos como tratamiento definitivo y, por lo tanto, la fundoplicatura por vía laparoscópica sigue siendo el estándar de oro para el tratamiento de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico.

During the last 2 decades, new endoscopic treatments have been developed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as alternatives to medical treatment or surgical fundoplication. These devices include application of radiofrequency treatment (Stretta), endoscopic plication (EndoCinch, Plicator, Esophyx, MUSE) and injection or implantation of biomaterials (Enteryx, Gatekeeper, Plexiglas, Duragel). Its objective is the relief of symptoms by creating an anatomical anti-reflux barrier. In this review, we consider articles indexed in Pubmed, Medline and Scielo in the last 10 years, reviewing a total of 55 papers, we analyse critically the reported results, although long-term data greater than 5 or 7 years are lacking. These procedures reduce the use of proton pump inhibitors by about 50%. Subjective evaluations report improvement in quality of life and patient satisfaction. However, objective evaluation with endoscopy, manometry, radiology and pHmetry are scarce and if there are, they do not show significant changes. There is no convincing evidence to adopt these methods as definitive treatment. Therefore, laparoscopic fundoplication is the gold standard for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de reflujo gastroesofágico en pediatría / Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux in childhood

El reflujo gastroesofágico es una situación frecuente en el primer año de vida. En ausencia de signos y síntomas de alarma, se lo considera fisiológico. No requiere estudios y puede ser abordado por el pediatra con medidas no farmacológicas. La enfermedad por reflujo (definidaporsíntomasmolestosocomplicaciones) debe ser manejada por el gastroenterólogo. Los exámenes complementarios tienen indicaciones precisas y el tratamiento incluye medidas no farmacológicas, farmacológicas y quirúrgicas (si fuera necesario). Nuestro objetivo es describir los diferentes métodos diagnósticos, sus indicaciones y limitaciones, así como los recursos terapéuticos disponibles, incluidas las indicaciones y los efectos adversos

Gastro esophageal reflux is a frequent condition in infants. In the absence of warning symptoms and signs, it is considered physiologic. No exam is required and a non-pharmacologic approach can be instituted by pediatricians. Gastro esophageal reflux disease is characterized by troublesome symptoms or complications and should be managed by a pediatric gastroenterologist. Diagnostic tests have accurate indications and treatment includes pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic measures as well as surgery. Our objective is to describe the different diagnostic methods, their indications and limitations as well as the therapeutic resources available, including indications and adverse effects.

Distúrbios funcionais esofágicos na avaliação pré-operatória de cirurgia bariátrica / Esophageal functional disorders in the pre-operatory evaluation of bariatric surgery

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Obesity is an independent risk factor for esophageal symptoms, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and motor abnormalities. When contemplating bariatric surgery, patients with obesity type III undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and also esophageal manometry (EMN), and prolonged pHmetry (PHM) as part of their pre-operative evaluation. OBJECTIVE: Description of endoscopy, manometry and pHmetry findings in patients with obesity type III preparing for bariatric surgery, and correlation of these findings with the presence of typical GERD symptoms. METHODS: Retrospective study in which clinical symptoms of GERD were assessed, focusing on the presence of heartburn and regurgitation. All patients underwent EMN, PHM and most of them EGD. RESULTS: 114 patients (93 females-81%), average age 36 years old, average BMI of 45.3, were studied. Typical GERD symptoms were referred by 43 (38%) patients while 71 (62%) were asymptomatic. Eighty two patients (72% of total) underwent EGD and 36 (42%) evidenced esophageal abnormalities. Among the abnormal findings, hiatal hernia was seen in 36%, erosive esophagitis (EE) in 36%, and HH+EE in 28%. An abnormal EMN was recorded in 51/114 patients (45%). The main abnormality was a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in 32%, followed by ineffective esophageal motility in 25%, nutcracker esophagus in 19%, IEM + hypotensive LES in 10%, intra-thoracic LES (6%), hypertensive LES (4%), aperistalsis (2%) and achalasia (2%). Among the 43 symptomatic patients, 23 (53%) had abnormal EMN and 31/71 asymptomatic cases (44%) also presented this finding (P=0.30). PHM showed abnormal reflux in 60/114 patients (53%), with a predominance of bi-positional reflux (42%), followed by supine reflux (33%) and upright reflux (25%). Abnormal PHM was found in 26/43 symptomatic cases (60%) and also among 34/71 asymptomatic cases (48%) (P=0.19). CONCLUSION: Manometric abnormalities were common in obesity type III patients, the most frequent being hypotensive LES, followed by IEM. Most patients were asymptomatic. There was no correlation between the finding of motor abnormalities and the presence of symptoms. More than half the patients had abnormal reflux at PHM. We found no significant correlation between abnormal reflux and the presence of symptoms.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: A obesidade é fator de risco independente para sintomas esofagianos, doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE) e alterações motoras. Pacientes com obesidade tipo III, candidatos à cirurgia bariátrica foram submetidos a endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA) e também realizaram esofagomanometria (EMN) e pHmetria prolongada (PHM) como parte da avaliação pré-operatória. OBJETIVO: Em um grupo de pacientes com obesidade tipo III em pré-operatório de cirurgia bariátrica, descrever os achados endoscópicos, manométricos e pHmétricos, correlacionando-os com a presença de sintomas típicos de DRGE. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, de pacientes com obesidade tipo III, candidatos a cirurgia bariátrica. A avaliação clínica focalizou a presença de sintomas típicos de DRGE (pirose/regurgitação); todos foram submetidos a EMN, PHM e a maior parte à EDA, realizada previamente. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 114 pacientes, 93 (81%) do sexo feminino, média de idade de 36 anos e IMC médio de 45,3. Sintomas típicos de refluxo foram referidos por 43 (38%) pacientes e 71 (62%) eram assintomáticos. EDA foi realizada por 82 (72%) pacientes, havendo anormalidades esofagianas em 36 (42%). Entre os anormais, havia hérnia hiatal (HH) em 36%, esofagite erosiva (EE) em 36% e HH + EE em 28%. A EMN foi anormal em 51/114 (45%). Entre os anormais, predominou o esfíncter esofagiano inferior (EEI) hipotenso em 32%, seguido por motilidade esofagiana ineficaz (MEI) em 25%, esôfago em quebra-nozes (19%), EEI hipotenso + MEI (10%), EEI intra-torácico (6%), EEI hipertenso (4%), aperistalse (2%) e acalasia (2%). Dentre os 43 sintomáticos, 23 (53%) apresentavam EMN anormal, sendo que em 31 dos 71 (44%) assintomáticos a EMN também era anormal (P=0,30). A PHM revelou refluxo anormal em 60 (53%) pacientes. Predominou o refluxo anormal biposicional (42%) seguido do refluxo supino (33%) e refluxo ereto (25%). Dentre os 43 pacientes sintomáticos, 26 (60%) apresentavam PHM anormal, sendo que em 34 dos 71 assintomáticos a PHM também era anormal (48%) - P=0,19. CONCLUSÃO: Alterações manométricas foram comuns em obesidade tipo III, sendo as mais frequentes o EEI hipotenso, seguida de motilidade ineficaz. A maioria dos pacientes era assintomática. Mais da metade dos pacientes apresentou refluxo anormal à PHM. Não houve diferença significativa entre o achado de refluxo anormal e a presença de sintomas. Não houve relação entre o achado de alterações motoras e a presença de sintomas.

Importance of esophageal pH monitoring and manometry in indicating surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the need of performing esophageal pH monitoring and manometry in patients with clinical suspicion of Gastroesophageal reflux disease, as more accurate and practical complementary exams in the indication of surgical treatment. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out in the PubMed/Medline database, based on the recommendations of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol, selecting studies in humans, published in Portuguese, Spanish, and English, from January 1, 2009 to August 5, 2020. The following descriptors were used: "reflux gastroesophageal" AND "surgery" AND "surgical treatment" AND "esophageal manometry" OR "pH monitoring". After that, retrospective or prospective observational studies with a sample of less than 100 individuals, or with limited access, reports or case series, review articles, letters, comments, or book chapters were excluded. To facilitate the application of the exclusion criteria, the Rayyan management base was used. RESULTS: Out of the 676 studies found, 19 valid and eligible studies were selected to make inferences. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the best evidence, currently, considering national particularities, performing a 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and esophageal manometry for all patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery.

Wireless ph monitoring and conventional esophageal ph monitoring: comparative study of discomfort, limitations in daily activities and complications / Phmetria sem cateter e phmetria esofágica convencional: estudo comparativo do desconforto, limitações das atividades diárias e complicações

ABSTRACT Background: The catheter of the esophageal pH monitoring is associated with nasal and throat discomfort, and different behave in patients. The capsule of the wireless pH monitoring may cause chest pain and complications. Aim: To compare the wireless and conventional pH monitoring concerning the degree of discomfort and limitations in daily activities, complications, ability to diagnose pathological reflux, and costs. Methods: Twenty-five patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were prospectively submitted, in a simultaneous initial period, to 24-hour catheter esophageal pH monitoring and 48-hour wireless system. After removing each system, patients underwent a specific clinical questionnaire. Results: Fifteen patients (60%) pointed a higher discomfort in the introduction of the capsule (p=0.327). Discomfort and limitations in daily activities were lower on 2nd day (p<0.05); however, continued to be expressive (32% to 44%). Chest pain occurred in 13 (52%) patients. The diagnostic gain of pathological reflux was 12% with the wireless system (p=0.355). Conclusions: 1) There is no significant difference between the discomfort mentioned in the introduction of the capsule and the catheter; 2) during reflux monitoring, the wireless system provides significant less discomfort and limitations in daily activities; 3) there is no significant difference between the two methods in the ability to diagnose pathological reflux; 4) wireless pH monitoring has higher cost.

RESUMO Racional: O cateter da pHmetria esofágica associa-se ao desconforto nasal e na garganta, e comportamento diferente nos pacientes. A cápsula da pHmetria sem cateter pode causar dor torácica e complicações. Objetivo: Comparar as pHmetrias sem cateter e a convencional, em relação ao desconforto e limitações das atividades diárias, complicações, capacidade de diagnosticar refluxo patológico, e custos. Métodos: Vinte e cinco pacientes com sintomas de refluxo gastroesofágico foram prospectivamente submetidos, em um período inicial simultâneo, à pHmetria esofágica com cateter durante 24 h e à pHmetria sem cateter durante 48 h. Após a retirada de cada método, pacientes responderam o questionário clínico específico. Resultados: Quinze pacientes (60%) relataram maior desconforto na introdução da cápsula (p=0,327). Desconforto e limitações das atividades diárias foram menores no 2º dia (p< 0,05); entretanto, continuaram sendo expressivos (32% a 44%). Dor torácica ocorreu em 13 (52%) pacientes. O ganho diagnóstico no refluxo patológico foi de 12% com o sistema sem cateter (p=0,355). Conclusões: 1) Não há diferença significativa entre o desconforto relatado na introdução da cápsula e do cateter; 2) durante a monitorização do refluxo, o sistema sem cateter proporciona significativo menor desconforto e limitações das atividades diárias; 3) não há diferença significativa entre os dois métodos na capacidade de diagnosticar o refluxo patológico; 4) pHmetria sem cateter tem custo maior.

Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH and psychometric properties in gastroesophageal reflux: systematic review / Impedância intraluminal multicanal associada à pHmetria e propriedades psicométricas do refluxo gastroesofágico: revisão sistemática

Abstract Objective: Systematically assess studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Systematically verify studies that have analyzed the psychometric properties of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric patients. Methods: Systematic review considering specific descriptors (children and adolescents, gastroesophageal reflux disease and multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH) and their synonyms. The systematic search was carried out in the MEDLINE/Ovid, Scopus, and Embase databases, considering the period from October 2017 to December 2018. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), which was used for study selection. The psychometric properties described in the studies were: sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and reproducibility. Results: Sensitivity was discussed in most studies, with a result of more than 70% in four of them. Specificity was assessed only in conjunction with sensitivity, with values from 23% to 25% in two studies, and it reached 80% in a single study. Accuracy was assessed higher than 76% in one of the selected articles. The methodological quality of the studies demonstrated low risk of bias, and there was no significant concern related to applicability of the studies. Conclusions: According to the selected studies, multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH was considered a safe and effective tool, presenting higher sensitivity values than pHmetry regarding the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar sistematicamente estudos que analisaram propriedades psicométricas da impedância intraluminal multicanal associada à pHmetria (IIM-pH) no diagnóstico de refluxo gastroesofágico. Verificar sistematicamente estudos que analisaram as propriedades psicométricas de impedância intraluminal multicanal associada à pHmetria em relação ao diagnóstico da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico em pacientes pediátricos. Métodos: Revisão sistemática que considerou descritores específicos (crianças e adolescentes, doença do refluxo gastroesofágico e impedância intraluminal multicanal associada à pHmetria) e seus sinônimos. A busca sistemática foi realizada nas bases de dados Medline/Ovid, Scopus e Embase e considerou o período de outubro de 2017 a dezembro de 2018. Esta revisão foi realizada de acordo com o checklist Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Prisma), usado para seleção de estudos. As propriedades psicométricas descritas nos estudos foram: sensibilidade, especificidade, acurácia e reprodutibilidade. Resultados: A sensibilidade foi discutida na maioria dos estudos, com um resultado de mais de 70% em quatro deles. A especificidade foi avaliada apenas em conjunto com a sensibilidade, com valores em torno de 23 a 25% em dois estudos, e alcançou 80% em um único estudo. A acurácia foi avaliada em mais de 76% em um dos artigos selecionados. A qualidade metodológica dos estudos demonstrou baixo risco de viés e nenhuma consideração significativa relacionada à aplicabilidade dos estudos. Conclusões: De acordo com os estudos selecionados, a impedância intraluminal multicanal associada à pHmetria foi considerada uma ferramenta segura e eficaz, apresentou valores de sensibilidade superiores à pHmetria no diagnóstico da doença do refluxo gastroesofágico.

Práticas de médicos brasileiros no manejo de sintomas sugestivos de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico: uma avaliação multidisciplinar / Brazilian physicians' practices on the management of symptoms suggesting gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multidisciplinary survey

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines are available to steer decisions regarding diagnosis, management and treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Despite this, variations in physician's practices regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are well described in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To describe practices of physicians from different specialties on the management of patients with typical symptoms of GERD (heartburn and regurgitation) in a Brazilian sample. METHODS: National online survey enrolling a sample of general practitioners, gastroenterologists, cardiologists and otolaryngologists. The survey was conducted from August 6th to September 12th, 2018. Subjects answered a structured questionnaire addressing variables regarding physicians' profile (age, sex, specialty, practice setting, years in practice, type of medical expense reimbursement), their patients characteristics and prescribing behaviors. RESULTS: The final weighted sample was comprised of 400 physicians, 64% male, with an average of 15 years of experience. Physicians' estimates of gastroesophageal symptoms prevalence among their pool of patients was 37.6% for the total sample, reaching 70.3% among gastroenterologists. The medical specialty with lower average percentage of patients presenting gastroesophageal symptoms was otolaryngology (24.5%). Physicians reported that they request ancillary tests for 64.5% of patients with GERD typical symptoms. The most common diagnostic test was endoscopy (69.4%), followed by video nasolaryngoscopy (16.6%). The percentage of patient to whom endoscopy is performed was significantly higher among gastroenterologists and general practitioners as compared to otolaryngologists and cardiologists, while video nasolaryngoscopy is markedly more frequent among otolaryngologists. In terms of therapeutic options, the most frequently reported strategy was lifestyle modifications followed by proton pump inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Overall patients' profile and patterns of GERD diagnosis and management seem different between gastroenterologists, general practitioners, otolaryngologists, and cardiologists. Clinical guidelines should address this variability and include other medical specialties besides gastroenterologists in their scope.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: Diretrizes clínicas estão disponíveis para orientar decisões sobre diagnóstico, manejo e tratamento de desordens gastrointestinais. Apesar disso, variações nas práticas relacionadas aos sintomas de doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE) são observadas na literatura. OBJETIVO: Descrever os conhecimentos e práticas relacionados ao manejo de pacientes com sintomas típicos de DRGE (pirose e regurgitação) em uma amostra brasileira de médicos de especialistas e não especialistas. MÉTODOS: Inquérito nacional online investigando a conduta frente ao diagnóstico de DRGE em uma amostra de médicos generalistas, gastroenterologistas, cardiologistas e otorrinolaringologistas. O inquérito foi conduzido entre 6 de agosto e 12 de setembro de 2018. Os sujeitos responderam a um questionário estruturado avaliando variáveis relacionadas ao perfil dos médicos (idade, sexo, especialidade, contexto de prática, anos de experiência, tipo de reembolso de despesas médicas), características dos pacientes e comportamentos de prescrição. RESULTADOS: A amostra final ponderada foi composta por 400 médicos, 64% homens, com um tempo médio de experiência de 15 anos. A estimativa dos médicos a respeito da prevalência de sintomas gastroesofágicos entre seus pacientes foi de 37,6% para a amostra total, alcançando 70,3% entre gastroenterologistas. A especialidade médica com menor percentual de pacientes apresentando sintomas gastroesofágicos foi otorrinola­ringologia (24,5%). Os médicos requisitaram exames complementares em 64,5% dos pacientes com sintomas típicos de DRGE. O exame diagnóstico mais frequente foi endoscopia (69,4%), seguida de nasolaringoscopia (16,6%). O percentual de pacientes nos quais uma endoscopia é realizada é significativamente maior entre gastroenterologistas e médicos generalistas, quando comparado a otorrinolaringologistas e cardiologistas, enquanto nasolaringoscopia é marcadamente mais frequente entre otorrinolaringologistas. Em termos de opções terapêuticas, a estratégia mais frequentemente reportada foi modificações no estilo de vida, seguida de inibidores da bomba de prótons. CONCLUSÃO: De modo geral, o perfil de pacientes e os padrões de diagnóstico e manejo de DRGE parecem diferir entre gastroenterologistas, médicos generalistas, otorrinolaringologistas e cardiologistas. Diretrizes clínicas devem abordar esta variabilidade e incluir outras especialidades médicas além de gastroenterologistas em seu escopo.

Alteraciones bucales asociadas a la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico / Oral alterations associated to gastroesophageal reflux disease

RESUMEN Introducción: La enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico es un trastorno funcional, multifactorial, del tracto gastrointestinal superior. Las alteraciones bucales han sido consideradas como parte de sus manifestaciones extraesofágicas. Objetivo: Determinar las alteraciones bucales encontradas en pacientes con enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional descriptivo en 37 pacientes con diagnóstico de enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. Las variables analizadas fueron: edad, sexo, presencia de alteración, signos y síntomas, y localización. Se confeccionó base de datos con registros, se calcularon las frecuencias absolutas y porcentajes. Resultados: El 48,6 por ciento de los pacientes presentó alguna alteración bucal, como sensación de ardor o urente (40,5 por ciento) y eritema (35,1 por ciento). Entre las regiones afectadas se encontraron paladar blando/úvula (72,2 por ciento) y lengua (61,1 por ciento). Conclusiones: Casi la mitad de los pacientes afectados por reflujo gastroesofágico presentó alguna manifestación bucal. Las más frecuentemente encontradas fueron: la sensación de ardor o urente, eritema, sensación de boca seca y ulceraciones. Las localizaciones más frecuentes fueron paladar blando/úvula y lengua(AU)

ABSTRACT Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a functional multifactorial disorder of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Oral alterations are considered to be extraesophageal manifestations of this disease. Objective: Determine the oral alterations found in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Methods: An observational descriptive study was conducted of 37 patients diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease. The variables analyzed were age, sex, presence of alteration, signs and symptoms, and location. A database was developed with the information recorded, and absolute frequencies and percentages were estimated. Results: Of the patients studied, 48.6 percent had some sort of oral alteration, such as a burning sensation (40.5 percent) and erythema (35.1 percent). The regions affected included the soft palate / uvula (72.2 percent) and the tongue (61.1 percent). Conclusions: Almost half of the patients affected by gastroesophageal reflux had some sort of oral manifestation, the most common of which were a burning sensation, erythema, a dry mouth sensation and ulcerations. The most common locations were the soft palate / uvula and the tongue(AU)

Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring of reflux patterns in non-erosive reflux disease, reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn / 南方医科大学学报

OBJECTIVE@#To analyze the differences in reflux patterns in 24-hour esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH) and explore the possible mechanism of symptoms in patients with heartburn and negative endoscopic findings.@*METHODS@#Seventy-nine patients with heartburn as the main symptoms but negative endoscopic findings, including 35 with NERD, 16 with RH and 28 with FH, were enrolled in this study.All the patients underwent 24-h esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and esophagogastroscopy, and the results were compared among the 3 groups.@*RESULTS@#Acid reflux episode was significantly increased and weakly alkaline reflux episode was significantly decreased in NERD group in comparison with RH group and FH group (@*CONCLUSIONS@#Patients with NERD, RH and FH had different reflux patterns.Acid reflux is predominant in the NERD, while weakly alkaline reflux is significantly increased RH and FH.In patients with normal esophageal acid exposure but without symptoms or without recorded symptoms during esophageal pH-impedance monitoring, analysis of the total reflux episode, mixed reflux episode, proximal acid reflux episode and percentage can help in the differential diagnosis between RH and FH.

Relación del reflujo gastroesofágico y manifestaciones respiratorias, desde el punto de vista de la gastroenterología pediátrica / Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and respiratory manifestations, from the pediatric gastroenterologist point of view

Gastroesophageal reflux is a frequent condition in the daily life of infants and older children. When reflux causes symptoms, it is called gastroesophageal reflux disease. Different extraesophageal symptoms have been frequently attributed to gastroesophageal reflux, however, new diagnostic techniques available, such as pHmetry with impedance measurement, have allowed us to evaluate and eventually dismiss such relationships. In this article we review the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and laryngeal pathology, chronic cough, asthma and aspiration. In general terms, the empirical treatment of a presumed reflux is not recommended in asymptomatic patients, in whom its presence is not demonstrated by techniques such as pHmetry with impedance, given that therapeutic response is low and similar to placebo, with potential adverse effects.

El reflujo gastroesofágico es una condición frecuente en la vida diaria de lactantes y niños mayores. Cuando produce síntomas, se denomina enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico. Se ha atribuido frecuentemente diferentes síntomas extraesofágicos al reflujo, sin embargo, nuevas técnicas diagnósticas disponibles, como la pHmetría con medición de impedanciometría, han permitido evaluar y eventualmente descartar tales asociaciones. En este artículo se revisa la relación entre el reflujo gastroesofágico y patología laríngea, tos crónica, asma y aspiración. En términos generales, no se recomienda el tratamiento empírico de un supuesto reflujo en pacientes asintomáticos, en quienes tampoco esté demostrada su presencia por técnicas como la pHmetría con impedanciometría, dado que la respuesta terapéutica es baja y similar a placebo, con potenciales efectos adversos.

Acercamiento a la tos crónica en adultos / An approach to chronic cough

RESUMEN La tos crónica en los adultos puede ser causada por muchas causas, existen cuatro principales: el síndrome de tos de la vía aérea superior, enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico, reflujo laringofaríngeo, asma bronquial, y bronquitis eosinofílica no asmática. Todos los pacientes deben evaluarse clínicamente con espirometria, y comenzar con tratamiento empírico. Otras causas potenciales incluyen el uso de inhibidores de la enzima convertidora de la angiotensina, cambios medioambientales, uso del tabaco, enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica, y la apnea obstructiva del sueño. La radiografía del tórax puede orientar hacia causas infecciosas, inflamatorias, y malignas. Los pacientes con tos crónica refractaria pueden remitirse a la consulta especializada de un neumólogo u otorrinolaringólogo, además de un ensayo terapéutico con gabapentin, pregabalin, y psicoterapia.

ABSTRACT Although chronic cough in adults can be caused by many etiologies, four conditions account for most cases: upper airway cough syndrome, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, also known as laryngo- pharyngeal reflux disease, bronchial asthma, and non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis. All patients should be evaluated clinically with spirometry, and empiric treatment should be initiated. Other potential causes include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use, environmental triggers, tobacco use, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Chest radiography can rule out concerning infectious, inflammatory, and malignant thoracic conditions. Patients with refractory chronic cough should be referred to a pulmonologist or otolaryngologist in addition to a therapeutic trial of gabapentin, pregabalin, and psychotherapy.

Efecto del envejecimiento en el estudio y manejo de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico / Effect of aging on the study and management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) seems to increase in the elderly population, being more severe and associating more complications than younger subjects. A high frequency of atypical symptoms (chest pain, dysphagia, vomiting, and respiratory symptoms) and less frequently heartburn and / or regurgitation that are of mild intensity are described, due to the decrease of the visceral sensitivity of the esophagus with age, which delays the diagnosis. Factors associated with aging predispose to the development of GERD in the geriatric population: the reduction of salivary flow and bicarbonate secretion, alterations in esophageal motility and the greater frequency of hiatal hernias are some of them. Given the high frequency of complications of reflux (erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, stenosis and ulcers, and esophageal cancer), elderly patients benefit from an early endoscopic study. Its management must be aggressive and start with changes in lifestyle and dietary modifications. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) continue to be the first line of pharmacological treatment as well as in the youngest population. Surgical treatment is reserved in selected patients considering risks/benefits.

La prevalencia de la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) parece aumentar en la población adulto mayor, siendo más severa y asociando más complicaciones que en los sujetos más jóvenes. Clínicamente se caracteriza una alta frecuencia de síntomas atípicos (dolor torácico, disfagia, vómitos, síntomas respiratorios) y menos frecuentemente por pirosis y/o regurgitación que son de leve intensidad, debido a la disminución de la sensibilidad visceral del esófago con la edad, lo que hace retardar el diagnóstico. Factores asociados al envejecimiento predisponen al desarrollo de ERGE en la población geriátrica: la disminución de la secreción salival y de bicarbonato, las alteraciones de la motilidad esofágica y la mayor frecuencia de hernias hiatales, son algunos de ellos. Dada la alta frecuencia de complicaciones del reflujo (esofagitis erosiva, esófago de Barrett, estenosis y úlceras y cáncer de esófago), los pacientes adultos mayores se benefician de un estudio endoscópico precoz. Su manejo debe ser agresivo e iniciar con cambios de estilo de vida y modificaciones dietarias. Los inhibidores de bomba de protones (IBP) siguen siendo la primera línea de tratamiento farmacológico al igual que en la población más joven. El tratamiento quirúrgico queda reservado en pacientes seleccionados considerando riesgos/beneficios.

Monitorização prolongada do refluxo gastroesofágico por impedancio-pHmetria esofágica: uma revisão sobre o tema ponderada com nossa experiência de 1. 200 casos com o método / Prolonged gastroesophageal reflux monitoring by impedance-phmetry: a review of the subject pondered with our experience with 1, 200 cases

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Prolonged monitoring increased our knowledge on gastroesophageal reflux (GER), and the disease became known as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Prolonged reflux monitoring permits the diagnosis of GERD when endoscopic findings are not enough to characterize it. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to review the current knowledge on impedance-pH monitoring, taking into account the published literature and the authors experience with 1,200 exams. METHODS: The different types of prolonged reflux monitoring, namely: conventional pHmetry, catheter-free pHmetry and impedance-pHmetry will be briefly described. The new possibilities of evaluation with impedance-pHmetry are emphasized, namely: the study of symptomatic patients in use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs); evaluation of patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD although with normal endoscopy and normal pHmetry, diagnostic elucidation of patients with atypical symptoms or supra-esophageal symptoms, mainly chronic cough, study of patients complaining of belch, differentiating gastric and supra-gastric belching, and the proper work-up before anti-reflux surgery. RESULTS: When impedance was associated to pH monitoring, an impressive technological evolution became apparent, when compared to pH monitoring alone. The main advantages of impedance-pHmetry are: the ability to detect all types of reflux: acid, non-acid, liquid, gaseous. In addition, other important measurements can be made: the ability of the esophagus in transporting the bolus, the measurement of basal mucosal impedance and the evaluation of primary peristalsis post reflux. CONCLUSION: Impedance-pHmetry is a promising method, with great advantages over conventional pHmetry. The choice between these two types of monitoring should be very judicious. The authors suggest the importance of careful evaluation of each reflux episode by the physician responsible for the examination, necessary for the correct interpretation of the tracings.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: A monitorização prolongada ampliou o conhecimento sobre o refluxo gastroesofágico; a afecção decorrente do mesmo, passou a ser designada por doença do refluxo gastroesofágico (DRGE). O estudo prolongado do refluxo viabiliza o diagnóstico da DRGE nos casos sem alterações endoscópicas suficientes para caracterização da afecção. OBJETIVO: O objetivo do presente trabalho é apresentar uma revisão sobre a monitorização do refluxo por impedâncio-pHmetria, ponderando-se os dados de literatura com a experiência dos autores com o método em 1.200 exames realizados. MÉTODOS: São apresentados detalhes dos diferentes tipos de monitorização prolongada do refluxo; ou seja, a pHmetria convencional, a pHmetria sem cateter e a impedâncio-pHmetria. Salientam-se as novas possibilidades de avaliação que a impedâncio-pHmetria propicia e suas principais indicações: estudo de pacientes que permanecem sintomáticos durante o tratamento do refluxo com antissecretores; análise de pacientes com sintomas sugestivos de DRGE que não apresentem esofagite ao exame endoscópico e que tenham pHmetria normal; esclarecimento diagnóstico de pacientes com sintomas atípicos e supraesofágicos - em especial na tosse crônica; estudo da eructação diferenciando-as em dois grupos: gástricas e supragástricas e no auxílio na indicação do tratamento cirúrgico do refluxo. RESULTADOS: A monitorização associando duas modalidades de avaliação: a impedancio-pHmetria representa evolução tecnológica expressiva em relação à modalidade baseada apenas na análise do pH (pHmetria). As principais vantagens da impedâncio-pHmetria são: possibilidade de avaliação de todas modalidades de refluxo; ou seja, ácido, não-ácido, líquido e gasoso e também a possibilidade de estudo de outras variáveis importantes; ou seja: capacidade de transporte do bolus, impedância basal do esôfago e peristalse pós refluxo. CONCLUSÃO: A impedancio-pHmetria é um método promissor, com grandes vantagens sobre a pHmetria convencional. A escolha do tipo de monitorização a ser utilizada, deve ser criteriosa. Os autores destacam a importância da análise cuidadosa de cada episódio de refluxo, pelo médico responsável pela execução do exame, para correta interpretação e valorização dos dados obtidos.

Evolución clínica, funcional y radiológica de pacientes trasplantados pulmonares con síndrome de bronquiolitis obliterante y disfunción de injerto pulmonar restrictivo / Clinical, functional and radiological evolution of pulmonary transplant patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive graft dysfunction

Resumen La principal complicación a largo plazo en trasplantados de pulmón es la disfunción crónica de injerto identificado como bronquiolitis obliterante, existiendo un nuevo patrón denominado Disfunción de Injerto Restrictivo. Objetivo: Evaluar seguimiento espirométrico, radiológico y clínico entre pacientes con síndrome de bronquiolitis obliterante (SBO) y Disfunción de Injerto Restrictivo (DIR) post trasplante pulmonar. Metodología: Se revisaron registros clínicos de trasplantados pulmonares desde 1999 hasta 2017. Se efectuó seguimiento espirométrico e imágenes por tomografía de tórax y factores asociados: infección por Citomegalovirus(CMV), reflujo gastro-esofágico (RGE) y episodios de rechazo agudo. Se analizó sobrevida por Kaplan Meier. Resultados: De 88 pacientes trasplantados de pulmón, 40 desarrollaron disfunción crónica de injerto: 31 (80%) presentaron SBO y 9 (20%) tuvieron DIR. Edad promedio: 47 años en SBO y 46 años en DIR. Siendo fibrosis pulmonar la patología basal predominante en ambos. En SBO se consignaron 14 episodios de rechazo agudo (50%), infección por CMV en 18% y RGE activo en 26%. En la serie DIR hubo 5 episodios de rechazo agudo (62%), 13% de infección por CMV y 67% de RGE activo 6 (p = 0,02). En el seguimiento a 1-2-4-5 años el promedio del VEF1 en SBO fue: 67,3,65, 60 y 48% del valor predicho y en DIR fue 61, 65, 62 y 45% respectivamente. Las imágenes tomográficas en SBO mostraron: hiperinflación y en DIR: fibrosis pleuropulmonar superior. La sobrevida fue de 96,9 meses en SBO y 65,6 meses en DIR (p = 0,06). Conclusions: La disfunción restrictiva presentó menor sobrevida que SBO. RGE se asoció a rechazo restrictivo. La tomografía de tórax difiere en ambos tipos de rechazo crónico.

The main long-term complication in lung transplant patients is chronic graft dysfunction identified as bronchiolitis obliterans, and there is a new pattern called Restrictive Graft Dysfunction. Objective: To evaluate spirometric, radiological and clinical follow-up among patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and Restrictive Allograft Syndrome (RAS) after lung transplantation. Methodology: Lung transplant recipients ' clinical records were reviewed from 1999 to 2017. We carried out a follow up of spirometry, chest tomography imaging and associated factors: cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and episodes of acute rejection. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan Meier. Results: Out of 88 lung transplant patients, 40 developed chronic graft dysfunction: 31 (80%) presented BOS and 9 (20%) had RAS. Mean age: 47 yr.o. in BOS and 46 yr. o. in RAS. Lung fibrosis was the primary pathology predominant in both conditions. In BOS were reported 14 episodes of acute rejection (50%), CMV infection in 18% and active GER in 26%. In RAS there were 5 episodes of acute rejection (62%), CMV infection in 13% and active GER in 67% (p = 0.02). VEF1 follow-up at 1-2-4-5 years averaged 67, 65, 60 and 8% of reference value in BOS and 61, 65, 62 and 45% in RAS respectively. CT scans showed hyperinflation in BOS and upper pleuropulmonary fibrosis in RAS. BOS survival time was 96.9 months versus 65.6 months in RAS (p = 0.06). Conclusiones: Restrictive dysfunction presented a lower survival rate than BOS. GER was associated with restrictive rejection. Chest tomography differs in both types of chronic rejection.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with long standing type 1 diabetes mellitus: utility of two self-report questionnaires in a multifactorial disease / Enfermedad por Reflujo Gastroesofágico en pacientes con Diabetes Mellitus tipo 1: utilidad de dos cuestionarios auto-aplicables

Abstract Background: Gastroesophageal pathologies are common and multifactorial in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). The evaluation with endoscopy and 24 h pH esophageal monitoring is expensive and not always available in all medical centers, especially in developing countries so more cost-effective algorithms for diagnosis are required. Clinical questionnaires are easy to apply but its utility for gastroesophageal reflux disease screening in patients with long standing T1DM must be analyzed. Objective: To evaluate the utility of the FSSG and Carlsson-Dent (CDQ) questionnaires to detect the frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with T1DM. Methods: Analytic cross-sectional study, included 54 randomly selected patients from the T1DM clinic in our hospital. Before their routine evaluation, were asked to answer FSSG and CDQ questionnaires, classifying them as positive with a score >8 or >4, respectively. we associated and compared the clinical and biochemical characteristics between patients with or without gastroesophageal reflux detected through questionnaires. Results: Median age was 29 years (22-35), 67% were female (median of 16 years from diagnosis). In 39% of the patients FSSG was positive, CDQ was positive in 28%. A total of 71% of patients were taking medications to treat non-specific gastric symptoms. The concordance between questionnaires was 65% (p: <0.001). Those patients with tobacco consumption as well as those with poor glycemic control were more likely to score positive in either questionnaire. Conclusions: Patients T1DM had a high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In those patients FSSG questionnaire detected a higher number of patients in comparison with CDQ.

Resumen Introducción: Las patologías gastroesofágicas son comunes y multifactoriales en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 (DM1). La evaluación por medio de panendoscopia y pHmetría es costosa y difícil de realizar en todos los centros de atención, por lo que se requieren algoritmos rentables para su diagnóstico. Existen cuestionarios sencillos y autoaplicables que pueden ser útiles para el diagnóstico de enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico en los pacientes con DM1. Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad de los cuestionarios FSSG y Carlsson-Dent (CDQ) para detectar la enfermedad por reflujo gastroesofágico (ERGE) en pacientes con DM1. Métodos: Estudio transversal, se incluyeron 54 pacientes, elegidos al azar de la clínica de DMT1. Previo a la consulta, se les solicitó contestaran los cuestionarios FSSG y el CDQ, considerándose positivos para diagnóstico de ERGE los puntajes >8 y >4, respectivamente. Se analizaron y compararon las características bioquímicas y clínicas entre los pacientes con y sin síntomas de ERGE detectada por medio de los cuestionarios. Resultados: Los pacientes estudiados tenían edad de 29 años (22-35), 67% fueron mujeres, (mediana de diagnóstico de 16 años). El 39% de los pacientes tenían ERGE detectado mediante FSSG y 28% utilizando el cuestionario CDQ. El 71% de los pacientes reportó uso de medicamentos para reflujo. La concordancia entre ambos cuestionarios fue del 65% (p: <0.001). Pacientes que consumen tabaco y con descontrol glucémico, tenían más probabilidades de positividad en cualquier cuestionario. Conclusiones: Existe una alta prevalencia de ERGE en los pacientes con DM1. En esta población el cuestionario FSSG detectó a un mayor número de pacientes en comparación con el CDQ.

Mastócitos discriminam esofagite eosinofílica em pacientes pediátricos / Mast cells distinguish eosinophilic esophagitis in pediatric patients

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Mast cells exert a substantial role in gastrointestinal allergic diseases. Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that mast cell may aid diagnosis in eosinophilic gastroenteropathy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether mast cell count in the esophageal epithelium can discriminate eosinophilic esophagitis, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis. METHODS: Retrospectively we reviewed the files of 53 consecutive patients (age: 7.8 years; range: 8-14 years) with definitive diagnose established during clinical follow up in a universitary outpatient clinic as follow: eosinophilic esophagitis (N=23), PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis (N=15) and gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis (N=15). Eosinophil count in the esophageal epithelium in slides stained with H-E was reviewed and immunohistochemistry for mast cell tryptase was performed. RESULTS: Count of eosinophils/high-power field (HPF) higher than 15 were found in 14 out of 15 reflux esophagitis patients. The mean count of eosinophils/HPF was similar in eosinophilic esophagitis patients and in those with PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis (42 and 39 eosinophils/HPF, respectively, P=0.47). Values of mast cell tryptase (+) were higher in eosinophilic esophagitis [median: 25 mast cells/HPF; range (17-43) ] and in PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis patients [25 (16-32) ], compared to reflux esophagitis [4 (2-14) ], P<0.001. There was no difference between the mean count of mast cells/HPF in the esophageal epithelium of eosinophilic esophagitis patients and PPI-responsive eosinophilic esophagitis patients, respectively, 26 and 24 mast cells/HPF, P=0.391. CONCLUSION: Tryptase staining of mast cells differentiates eosinophilic esophagitis from reflux esophagitis.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: Os mastócitos detêm papel fundamental na resposta imuno-alérgica gastrintestinal. Assim, é razoável admitir que essas células sejam úteis no diagnóstico diferencial das gastroenteropatias eosinofílicas. OBJETIVO: Determinar se a análise quantitativa de mastócitos na mucosa esofágica permite discernir esofagite eosinofílica, esofagite eosinofílica responsiva ao inibidor de bomba de prótons e esofagite péptica por doença de refluxo gastroesofágico. MÉTODOS: Revisamos retrospectivamente os prontuários 53 crianças (idade: 7,8 anos; variação: 8-14 anos), atendidas consecutivamente, num serviço terciário e cujos diagnósticos definitivos estabelecidos após seguimento clínico foram esofagite eosinofílica (N=23), esofagite eosinofílica responsiva ao inibidor de bomba de prótons (N=15) e esofagite péptica por doença de refluxo gastroesofágico (N=15). As amostras histológicas foram revisadas quanto à contagem de eosinófilos na coloração de H-E e processadas para imunoistoquímica da triptase de mastócitos. RESULTADOS: Valores de eosinófilos/campo de maior aumento (CMA; 400X) >15 foram encontrados em 14 dos 15 pacientes com refluxo gastroesofágico. A média de eosinófilos/CMA foi similar nos pacientes com esofagite eosinofílica e com esofagite eosinofílica responsiva ao inibidor de bomba de prótons, respectivamente, 42 e 39 eosinófilos/CMA, P=0,47). Os valores de mastócitos triptase (+) foram superiores no epitélio esofágico dos pacientes com esofagite eosinofílica [mediana: 25 mastócitos/CMA; variação (17- 43) ] e na esofagite eosinofílica responsiva ao inibidor de bomba de prótons [25 (16-32) ], comparados aos pacientes com refluxo gastroesofágico [4(2-14) ], P<0,001. Não houve diferença entre a média de mastócitos/CMA nos pacientes com esofagite eosinofílica comparados aos com esofagite eosinofílica responsiva ao inibidor de bomba de prótons, respectivamente, 26 e 24 mastócitos/CMA, P=0,391. CONCLUSÃO: A coloração para mastócitos pela imunoistoquímica da triptase diferencia as esofagites eosinofílicas da esofagite péptica.

Combined 24-hours esophageal ph monitoring and multichannel intraluminal impedance for comparison of gastroesophageal reflux in children with typical versus atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease / Monitoramento combinado do pH esofágico e impedância intraluminal multicanal 24 horas para comparação de refluxo gastroesofágico em crianças, com sintomas típicos contra atípicos na doença do refluxo gastroesofágico

ABSTRACT Background - Gastroesophageal reflux disease is the most common esophageal disorder in pediatrics. Objective - The aim of this study was to compare reflux parameters of typical and atypical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease using 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and multichannel intraluminal impedance in pediatric population. Methods - In this prospective study, 43 patients aged less than 18 year with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups based on the main presenting symptoms (typical versus atypical). Twenty four-hour pH monitoring and multichannel intraluminal impedance were performed in all the patients for comparing these two group regarding association of symptoms and reflux. Number of refluxes, pH related reflux, total reflux time, reflux more than 5 minutes, longest time of the reflux, lowest pH at reflux, reflux index were recorded and compared. Data comparison was done using SPSS. Results - The mean age of the patients was 5.7±3.4 years and 65.1% were male. Out of 43 patients 24 cases had typical symptoms and 19 had atypical symptoms. The mean reflux events detected by multichannel intraluminal impedance was more than mean reflux events detected by pH monitoring (308.4±115.8 vs 69.7±66.6) with P value of 0.037, which is statistically significant. The mean symptom index and symptom association probability were 35.01% ± 20.78% and 86.42% ± 25.79%, respectively in multichannel intraluminal impedance versus 12.73% ± 12.48% and 45.16% ± 42.29% in pH monitoring (P value <0.001). Number of acid reflux was 46.26±47.16 and 30.9±22.09 for atypical and typical symptoms respectively. The mean symptom index was 18.12% ± 13.101% and 8.30% ± 10.301% in atypical and typical symptoms respectively (P=0.034). Bolus clearance was longer in atypical symptoms compared typical symptoms(P<0.05). Conclusion - Symptom index was significantly higher in atypical symptoms compared to typical symptoms. Higher number of acid reflux was found in children with atypical symptoms of reflux. Longer duration of bolus clearance was found in group with atypical symptoms of reflux.

RESUMO Contexto - O refluxo gastroesofágico é a doença esofágica mais comum em Pediatria. Objetivo - O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar parâmetros de refluxo em pacientes com sintomas típicos e atípicos de refluxo gastroesofágico na população pediátrica usando impedância intraluminal multicanal e monitoramento 24 horas do pH esofágico. Métodos - Neste estudo prospectivo, 43 pacientes com idade inferior a 18 anos com suspeita de refluxo gastroesofágico foram observados. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos com base nos principais sintomas de apresentação (típicos versus atípicos). Foram realizados em todos os pacientes, monitoramento de 24 horas do pH e impedância intraluminal multicanal para comparar esses dois grupos em relação a associação de sintomas e refluxo. Número de refluxos, pH relacionados com refluxo, tempo total de refluxo, refluxo maior do que 5 minutos, tempo mais longo de refluxo, pH mais baixo no refluxo, índice de refluxo foram registrados e comparados. Comparação de dados foi feita usando SPSS. Resultados - A idade média dos pacientes foi 5.7±3.4 anos e 65,1% eram do sexo masculino. Dos 43 pacientes, 24 tinham sintomas típicos e 19 atípicos. A média de eventos de refluxo detectados por impedância intraluminal multicanal foi maior do que a detectada pelo monitoramento do pH (308.4±115.8 vs 69.7±66.6) com P=0,037, que é estatisticamente significativo. O índice médio de sintoma e a probabilidade de associação do sintoma foram 35.01% ± 20.78% e 86.42% ± 25.79%, respectivamente em impedância intraluminal multicanal contra 12,73% ± 12,48% e 45% ± 42,29% em monitoramento do pH (P valor < 0,001). O número de refluxos ácidos foi 46,26±47,16 e 30,9±22,09 para sintomas típicos e atípicos, respectivamente. O índice médio de sintoma foi de 18,12% ± 13,101% e 8,30% ± 10,301% em sintomas típicos e atípicos em respectivamente P=0,034). A limpeza do bolus foi maior no grupo de sintomas atípicos quando comparados a sintomas típicos. (P<0,05) Conclusão -O Índice de sintoma foi significativamente maior nos pacientes com sintomas atípicos em comparação com os de sintomas típicos. Maior número de refluxos ácidos foi encontrado em crianças com sintomas atípicos de refluxo. Maior duração da limpeza do bolus foi encontrada no grupo com sintomas atípicos de refluxo.